Effects of Clear Cutting

Megan Stubblefield
Contributor: Sally Painter
Deforestation

According to the Oregon Forest Resources Institute (OFRI), clear cutting is the process by which all the trees in a given section of a forest are logged at once, with only a small number of trees left standing. While OFRI indicates that the trees in question are replanted after two years, the replanting does not undo all the damage that clearcutting can cause.

Habitat Loss

The trees removed during a clearcut were part of the local ecosystem. According to the OFRI, some of the animals that depended on the trees may be displaced as a result of clearcutting, and they may have to find new habitats. The local flora may also fail to adapt. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) says that most animals in this situation will fail to adapt to new habitats, and they will become that much more vulnerable to predators.

Local Ecosystem Effects

Clearcutting can have complicated effects on local ecosystems, however. According to the Forestry Department of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FOA), the simple industrial processes involved in forest utilization can leave different ecosystems more vulnerable to invasive plants and animals.

Threat of Invasive Species

FOA alludes to specific cases where invasive species replaced indigenous ant species as an indirect result of clearcutting procedures. The loss of even a few indigenous species can alter the entire balance of an ecosystem. It can take years before the ecosystem in question finds a new normal.

Problems With Invasive Species

The National Wildlife Federation (NWF) outlines many of the specific problems that invasive species can cause. Alterations in soil chemistry have been linked to invasive species according to the NWF, so the plants that humans and the local wildlife need may be indirectly affected by invasive species. The NWF also points out that invasive species may fill niches formerly occupied by animals that were economically important to humans or nutritionally important to wildlife while they themselves may be useless. Invasive species may also introduce new diseases, which could affect humans and wildlife, according to the NWF.

Carbon Dioxide Levels

As Keisha Raines at Save the Sierra indicates, almost anything that removes a large number of trees is going to have some effect on carbon dioxide levels since trees function as effective carbon sinks. Clearcutting on a large scale could have a significant impact on global climate change.

Erosion and Soil Damage

According to the WWF, trees can essentially act as anchors for soil. Removing those anchors can make the soil more vulnerable to erosion. Raines also points out that removing trees during clearcutting can also take away the bacteria, worms, and fungi that maintain and treat the forest soil, and removing these organisms may also put other forest plants at an increased risk of illnesses. The degradation of soil is one of the most pressing environmental issues facing society at present and clearcutting only contributes to it.

Erosion and Soil Damage

Natural Disaster Risk

  • Raines indicates that clearcutting can worsen the results of flooding since the lost trees can no longer function as barriers and sinks for the excess water.
  • Daniel Rogge at the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire discusses the fact that clearcutting can increase the risk of landslides. Rogge indicates that root systems help anchor the soil and the forest canopy helps keep the forest relatively dry while logging machinery itself may degrade the topsoil and make it less absorbent.
  • FOA discusses the ways in which clearcutting can change the prevalence of different diseases in different areas. For example, clearcutting can create new breeding grounds for mosquitoes, which can transmit deadly diseases ranging from malaria to yellow fever. The explosion of Lyme disease in the United States can also be traced to forest degradation since the subsequent ecological changes led to a larger mouse population, and ticks get the Lyme disease bacteria from mice.

Economic Problems

According to Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch (EPFW), while clearcutting is potentially economically beneficial for timber owners, contractors and employees do not receive the same benefits. The EPFW points to data that suggests that the recreation associated with national forests may bring in 31 times as much income as logging these same national forests in the United States, and recreation may yield as many as 38 times as many jobs.

Aesthetic Problems

As a result of clearcutting, a formerly vibrant forest can look diminished and sparse. The aesthetic value of forests has economic value since beautiful forests can increase the property value of a given area and attract tourists. The EPFW talks about how the natural beauty of the Sierra Nevada forests is a tremendous draw in terms for both tourists and people interested in relocating.

Limitation to Previous Recreation

Recreation is one of the ways in which the habitat loss caused by clearcutting can intersect with other consequences of clearcutting since people interested in hunting or fishing for certain wildlife may lose the opportunity to do so as a result of clearcutting. While the value of natural beauty can be difficult to quantify, the EPFW refers to statistics that suggest that scenic highways may bring in as much as 32,500 dollars per mile.

Pros of Clearcutting Practices

While there certainly are many negatives to clearcutting, there are decided positives that can be very beneficial to ecosystems. According to the Sierra Logging Museum before a clearcut harvest is approved, several requirements must be met that include. "reforestation, erosion control, wildlife protection, and water quality protection." Westmoreland Woodlands Improvement Association (WWIA) states the perception of clear cutting being harmful to the environment is incorrect. The association points out:

  • Clearcutting is an effective way to regenerate a forest with healthier trees.
  • Good forestry practices include clearcutting with timber harvesting being a byproduct and not the objective.
  • True clear cutting removes all trees greater than two inches in diameter to encourage forest regeneration.
Clear Cutting Practices

Remedy to Stunted Diseased Forests

Clearcutting provides a way to clear stunted and diseased forests and afford the opportunity to replant and produce a healthy growing forest. The clean slate offers the ability of artificial regeneration with a planned forest that includes a variety of species. In natural reforestation, plants that previously didn't grow underneath the forest canopy will thrive and provide new food sources for animals while encouraging new wildlife to move in.

  • Clearcut land provides an opportunity to create a bridge between two different habitats. This allows greater animal diversity within a given area.
  • Low -growing plants, grasses and briar thickets take over clearcut areas and provide a haven for smaller animals.
  • Clearcut land can play a role similar to controlled burning (prescribed burning) since the litter layer (deadwood, leaves, and debris) is removed during the process. This helps to prevent and/or control wildfires.

Clear Cutting Benefits to Soil and Water

According to WWIA, it's a popular misconception that clearcutting increases soil erosion. The organization points to poorly planned road systems as the biggest cause of erosion, not clearcutting. Clearcutting is said to benefit both soil and water. These benefits include:

  • The soil's ability to retain water improves in clearcut areas.
  • The ecosystem is better able to support a thriving healthy forest.
  • Storm water accumulation results in improved ecosystems and can sometimes create new ecosystems.
  • Water flow is increased in clearcut lands and brings greater abundance to these areas.
  • Stream flow is greatly improved with less water being consumed by trees.

Financial Advantages to Clear Cutting Forests

There are arguments that clearcutting offers several financial advantages. One argument claims most timber companies profit greater from selective cutting than they do from clearcutting. Selective cutting is based on market value, while clearcutting gives a mix of trees, some not suitable for veneers or other uses. Others argue that it costs less to clearcut than it does to harvest trees through selective cutting. Depending on which side you believe, timber companies could see an increased profit from clearcut harvested trees.

Clear Cutting Transforms Areas

While some of the negative effects of clearcutting are obvious, there are beneficial and positive ones, especially for unhealthy forests. Clearcutting can transform an area in several ways that can be a mix of good and bad. Before making a decision about clearcutting your property, consider all these aspects.

Effects of Clear Cutting